🔗 Share this article

Apple could be required to allow competitors to operate their own application platforms on Apple devices in the UK, after a decision from the competition regulator.

This would be a significant change to the company's infamous "walled garden" where apps can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has designated both the tech giants as having "dominant market position" - effectively saying they have significant control over smartphone ecosystems.

Watchdog Findings

The regulator said the two companies "may be limiting innovation and competition".

But the authority clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the firms.

"The app economy contributes one and a half percent of the UK's GDP and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's crucial these sectors function properly for enterprises," stated a senior official from the competition authority.

Approximately ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones run on Apple or Google's operating systems, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

According to recent analysis, 48.5% of UK mobile owners own an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the overwhelming bulk of the remaining users using the Android OS.

The Company's Response

The regulatory probe examined how dominant the companies' own apps are versus competitors - as well as their web applications and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but previously it published guidelines detailing potential measures it could take.

These comprise mandating it to be easier for people to switch between Apple and Android phones, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

The Cupertino company specifically may be compelled to allow alternative app stores on its products, and enable people to download programs straight from developer sites.

This would mirror a similar ruling in the EU, which previously took action against the company for restrictive practices.

Apple cautioned the UK could lose access to receiving updates - as has occurred in the European Union - which the organization blames on strict rules.

For example, some AI capabilities which have been launched in other parts of the world are not accessible in the EU.

"We encounters intense rivalry in every market where we do business, and we strive continuously to create the best products, solutions and user experience," the organization said in a statement.

"Britain's implementation of European regulations would weaken that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and security, delayed access to latest functions, and a divided, less seamless experience."

Google's Standpoint

Google device owners can presently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as smooth as Google's own Play Store.

The regulator's plan said Google may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications straight from websites, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using third-party platforms.

"We simply do not see the rationale for the current classification," a Google policy executive remarked.

The representative said "most" of Android users use third-party platforms or install applications straight from a developer's website, and claimed there is a much wider selection of apps offered for Google device owners versus those on iOS products.

"There are now twenty-four thousand Google-compatible devices from 1,300 phone manufacturers worldwide, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson added.

Google's platform is an freely available software, which means creators can utilize and develop on top of it for no cost.

The company contends this means it promotes competition.

But consumer groups said curbs on these firms' dominance in other countries "currently assist enterprises to develop and providing customers more choice".

"The companies' control is now causing real harm by restricting choice for consumers and market rivalry for businesses," commented a policy expert.